Publications

Created on Wednesday, November 29 2006 05:00

Sign up for our monthly eNewsletter or our quarterly health and wellness magazine 'Hallmark Health Magazine". Each publication is packed with the latest information on services, programs and free seminars and screenings available throughout Hallmark Health System.

Also, please check our website regularly for other updates. Use the convenient form below to subscribe to our monthly eNewsletter or Hallmark Health Magazine.

Sign up for our eNewsletter or Hallmark Health Magazine

Hallmark Health System Magazine

Hallmark Health System Magazine - a health and wellness publication

Hallmark Health System Magazine Winter 2014

 

Hallmark Health System Magazine Fall 2013

Hallmark Health Magazine Summer 2013

summer2013cover

 

Hallmark Health System Magazine Winter 2012

hhsmagcover1.2013

Hallmark Health System Magazine Fall 2012

 

finalhhsmagazinefall2012_page_01

 

Hallmark Health System Magazine Summer 2012

perssummercover

Hallmark Health System Magazine Spring 2012

spring2012cover

 

Hallmark Health Magazine Winter 2011

persplatewi12_h11815_14 - final_page_01

 

 


Nursing News 2012

nursingcoverpage


Safety Counts! a newsletter highlighting safety at Hallmark Health System

Do you have a safety story to share? The Safety Counts team wants to hear from you. Email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Safety Counts April 2014 - Download entire PDF by clicking here. 

New ID wristbands add 'charm' to patient safety

In late February, Hallmark Health System (HHS) inpatients started sporting new ID wristbands aimed at improving patient safety and comfort. The new wristband looks a bit like a charm bracelet with several snap-on, color-coded tabs to let clinicians know of special risks associated with the patient wearing it.The colors of the snap-ons reflect a national colorcoding standard now used in most states in the U.S. (though not yet in Massachusetts).

The move to the national standard began at HHS in the Emergency Department (ED). “An ED nurse came to our Nursing Practice Quality Council and proposed that we change,” said Diane Hanley, RN, associate CNO for Practice, Quality and Education. “She mentioned that some nurses in the ED also work at other hospitals that used a different color-coding system and so different colors meant different things. There was clearly the potential to misinterpret the color codes and jeopardize patient safety so we opted to switch to the national standard.”

The snap-on type of wristband was chosen, said Hanley,“because it is both color-coded and each tab has the name of the risk imprinted on it – on the purple tab,for example, it also says ‘DNR.’ Nurses seem to really like this improvement.” Patients seem to like it as well since those with multiple risk factors need to wear only one wristband.
 
The wristbands are assembled by nurses for each patient. “Each time a patient moves – from the ED to a patient floor, for example – the wristbands are checked again. And a new tab can be added if a new risk becomes apparent,” said Hanley.


Case Study

Wanted: Ideas to improve this patient's experience

As an organization, Hallmark Health System (HHS) works tirelessly to ensure a culture of safety and that each patient receives the highest quality of care through every interaction. This includes taking into account how a patient perceives the way care is being delivered. Recently, HHS President and CEO Michael Sack received a letter from a patient who said she arrived at the Emergency Department at 7 a.m., was told that she would be admitted, waited all day before she was brought to the floor, had trouble with an IV and was awakened in the middle of the night for a blood draw. Her perception is that little was done to take care of her leaking IV or inform her of the time it would take to admit her to the floor. By the time she got to the nursing unit in the early evening, she was exhausted and then awakened at 3 a.m. for a procedure. She was discharged only to be asked to come back to remove her IV, which was done in a non-patient care area.

“This is an unfortunate example of a lot of things not going right for this patient,” said Sack. “Good intentions did not get the job done. In a busy environment we can easily forget to consider how the patient feels and thinks.” Many of the activities that care providers experience as commonplace are new to the patient and can be worrisome. How often was this patient updated around timing of her admission? When the IV issue was addressed, did staff take the time to address other concerns or fears that the IV problem evoked? Did staff talk with her about what to expect during the night? How can HHS address issues that may impact patients’ perceptions of care, including issues around safety, clinical care and communication?

Send suggestions to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . HHS is committed to creating a culture of safety that not only provides exceptional care, but helps patients know they are receiving exceptional care.


Keeping CAUTI at bay: CMS sponsored program helps cut catheter use and infection

CAUTI is the acronym for Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection, the most common of all hospital-acquired infections.graph
In 2012, Hallmark Health System (HHS) joined the CMS-sponsored “Stop CAUTI” initiative to decrease urinary catheter usage and reduce the number of CAUTIs to zero.Urinary catheters are placed in about 25 percent of hospital inpatients and many of these are not essential for a patient’s medical care. “We can’t avoid all urinary catheters,” said HHS Director of Quality and Patient Safety Kathleen Charbonnier, RN, BSN, CCRN, NE-BC. “The key is to place a catheter only when it is clinically indicated – for example, when monitoring urine output for a critically ill patient. Even when a urinary catheter is required for a patient’s treatment, the aim is to remove it as soon as it is no longer medically necessary. The longer a catheter remains in place, the more likely a CAUTI will develop.”

The goal for HHS is threefold: reduce the number of catheter insertions, develop a standardized catheter-removal protocol and eliminate CAUTIs. An interdisciplinary CAUTI team was formed and Med 3 at Melrose-Wakefield Hospital was chosen as the pilot site. The team provided education for all shifts. “We also redesigned our nurse-driven catheter removal protocol and worked with IT to enhance catheterrelated documentation in the EMR,” she said. Other improvements included daily catheter reporting, entering every CAUTI into
RMPro, and instituting a “tracer” system for monthly rounding. While CAUTIs have not yet been reduced to zero, the team
believes it is only a matter of time. “The hospital leadership, our nurses and physicians are all committed to the goal of zero
CAUTIs,” said Charbonnier. 


Employees empowered through teamwork to prevent errors

Radiation therapy staff are expert planners. Patients with cancer visit the Hallmark Health System (HHS) Radiation Therapy Department
several days before they actually begin radiation treatments. The goal is precision – to ensure that radiation is delivered to the exact area needed and no other. At HHS, the radiation therapy team consists of administrative staff, nurses, physicist, dosimetrists, radiation therapists and radiation oncologists. “The physicist and dosimetrists are the ‘architects’ of treatment, who draw the blueprint for clinicians to use during treatment,” said Glenn Davis, HHS operations manager for Oncology.

Last summer, one of the dosimetrists noticed a discrepancy among the pieces of documentation for a patient’s planned treatment.
“It was a left side/right side issue,” said Davis, “and, had it not been spotted, the patient could have received radiation on the wrong
side.” The dosimetrist spoke up, asked for clarification to resolve which side was the target and submitted a “near miss” RMPro report.
The key phrase here is “spoke up.” “Because everyone on the radiation therapy team feels empowered to speak up – in the interests
of process improvement instead of individual blame – the mistake was caught and no harm was done,” said Davis.

And the key concept is teamwork. “No one is better than anyone else on our team,” he added. “We are all responsible for the series of
checks and double-checks – through software, checklists and other tools – that ensure the quality of our work. And we are all very
comfortable about raising questions and concerns when patient safety is at stake.”

 

 Vol 2, No. 4, April 2014

Safety Counts April 2014SafetyCountsApril

 

Vol. 2, No. 2, February 2014 

Safety Counts February 2014

FebSafetyCountscover

Vol. 2, No. 3, March 2014

Safety Counts March 2014

MarchSafetyCounts

 

Vol. 1, No. 5, December 2013

Safety Counts December 2013

Safety Counts December 2013

 

Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2014 

Safety Counts January 2014

Safety Counts December 2013

Vol. 1, No. 4, November 2013

Safety Counts November 2013

Safety Counts November 2013

Vol. 1, No. 3, October 2013

 Safety Counts October 2013

SafetyCounts October 2013

Vol. 1, No. 2, August 2013

 FINALSafetyCountsAug2013for
Vol.1, No. 1, July 2013finalsafetycounts_page_1

 

 


Annual Report

AnnualReportCover2013


Patient Handbook

finalpatienthandbookforwebsite_page_01